Thursday, April 19, 2018

City of Howell Fails to Follow State Law Notification for Special Assessment


The City of Howell’s notification to create a Special Assessment for Police Services is defective as it fails to follow State law. Says Doug Heins, a former Howell City Council Member.

Michigan’s law NOTICE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS Act 162 of 1962 requires all property owners be notified of their right to protest and appeal a special assessment.

The notification the city mailed out to property owners failed to include to include this legal requirement.  

“The hearing schedule for Monday April 23, 2018 will be invalid” stated Heins.  “The city is in such a hurry to jam this special assessment down our throats they failed to follow legal procedures.” 

“This is just more example of how our city being mismanaged.  They have spent themselves into a hole and think they can blame lack of State reimbursements for their budget shortfall”

“The City originally considered asking for a Headlee Override but rejected that approach, choosing more heavy-handed approach by creating a Special Assessment District to bypass the voters.”

“Not allowing a vote on their spending and taxing decisions show a great deal of disrespect to all city residents” Say Heins “They are wasting everyone’s time with this illegal hearing.”

Wednesday, April 18, 2018

City of Howell To Illegally Assess Property Owners for Police Protection


The City of Howell’s proposed use of an obscure Public Safety Special Assessment (Act 33 of 1951) process to balance the city budget for police protection is illegal states former longtime City Councilman Douglas Heins.
A special Public Safety assessment cannot be used to sustain a government function yet the city has clearly admitted they plan to defund the police to pay for other services and debt and replace the money with an illegal special assessment  I’ve been involved in city budgeting over the years and I can say some long-time members on this Council have made very poor budgeting decisions
On background the legal theory of special assessments is they create a public benefit and make property values rise because the government’s assessment improves the land and they has a right to charge the property owner a special assessment tax.  
Michigan's Supreme Court ruled in 1986 the only justification for a special assessment levy is to increase a property's market value, so there must be a measurable special benefit for the special assessment to be valid. 
City Police protection already exists, so using a special assessment to continue an existing benefit, makes it hard to legally argue our property values will increase.  The city is actually creating a fake hardship to justify this assessment by defunding the police.
The city’s process for the creating an assessment district is also questionable. The city assessor will have to be very creative in pretending there is property improvement values to justify the assessments.  
Every property owner needs to ask the assessor how this assessment will increase the benefit for our property because Council made a decision to defund the police department. This assessment does not create a new Public Safety benefit, but only maintains the status quo.      
Also, people really need to question how the city has been spending money in the past. The city is crying poor but they recently locked up 3 million dollars in a vacant land deal to subsidize a development project. If the city had sold this property outright that would be 3 million more dollars in the bank right now. 
 It’s pretty clear this assessment process has the backing of the Michigan Municipal League and Howell is the test case, so if this passes without a challenge, every small city in Michigan will be doing the same thing.  
 The crazy quirk about this type of special assessment process is every property owner has to attend the public hearing and protest on the record to preserve their rights.  If a protest is not recorded at the public hearing the property owner person loses the right to challenge the legality of assessment at the Michigan Tax Tribunal.
If the city has a case for money more they should put it to a vote, and stop making property owners jump through hoops. This is a stupid, arrogant way to ask the public for more money.
By law a special assessment must apply to all properties even those exempt from taxation.  So, does the city plan to assess schools to pay for police protection? And if they do, how can the city argue that a school’s property value increases from the special assessment?  How about someone that has a vacant lot? How does vacant land get a special benefit from police protection?    
It’s the classic issue, of a spending problem not a revenue problem. The city is currently using thousands of dollars in general fund money to pay downtown projects, this is money that should be used for police, not parking lots.  Their priorities are all screwed up
Why should every property owner be forced to file a legal challenge to the Michigan Tax Tribunal?    It’s a gross abuse of the law’s real intent